This is a heading
This is a subheading 123
this is some text which will go here
This news article is more than 12 months old and some of the information may be out of date - please see our latest news articles here.
This Quarter 2 survey focuses on issues around regulation, licensing, and possible future developments in policy.
Landlords were asked about licensing and their experience of local licensing authorities during Covid-19. Landlords also gave their views on possible regulatory innovations – specifically redress schemes and lifetime deposits. Following on from previous surveys, the topic of Property MOTs as an alternative to local licensing schemes was revisited.
Finally, the NRLA worked in partnership with Battersea Dogs’ Home to better understand landlord attitudes towards letting tenants who own cats and/or dogs.
Among the key issues discussed in the report:
There is support for scheme and policy innovation to which landlords contribute financially. However,there appears little confidence among landlords in the ability of local authorities to deliver any scheme which improves the experience of private renting. Support for a national scheme is high BUT only if it works as a replacement for local licensing schemes.
In Wales there are renewed calls for Rent Smart Wales to be scrutinised via an independent evaluation.
Two thirds of landlords are willing to let property to tenants with a pet (by which here we mean a cat or a dog). Many landlords require advanced permission. Landlords are more reluctant to let to tenants with a cat or dog when letting a property with no garden or access to open space.
Landlords have a range of legitimate concerns about tenants keeping pets. A range of mechanisms exist which may help some landlords overcome their caution (often based on past experience). However, it should always be borne in mind that many properties in the PRS are simply not suitable for cats or dogs, whilst many landlords are themselves restricted by lease conditions.