This is a heading
This is a subheading 123
this is some text which will go here
This news article is more than 12 months old and some of the information may be out of date - please see our latest news articles here.
As a landlord, it’s crucial to be sure that your tenants’ deposits are adequately and legally protected, as there is a legal requirement to protect any tenancy deposits taken in a government authorised tenancy deposit scheme.
It’s estimated that around 4.5 million tenants’ deposits, worth around £4.5 billion, are being held in government approved protection schemes, or by a landlord or letting agent. But it’s also estimated that there are more than half a million deposits that are not protected, 17 years after deposit protection was first introduced.
If you’re a new landlord it’s important to understand your legal responsibilities around tenancy deposit protection, so that you follow, and comply, with the law. NRLA tenancy deposit protection partner, mydeposits, has put together this useful guide, which will cover:
A tenancy deposit (sometimes known as a security deposit) is often taken by the landlord at the beginning of a tenancy. It is then protected by the landlord and either returned in full at the end of a tenancy or could be subject to deductions if there is damage to the property or if rent is owed. Though there’s no legal requirement to take a deposit, it’s good practice to make sure that there is a financial safety net in place, if there is any damage. It’s also a great incentive for most tenants to look after a property well as they won’t want to lose any money through deposit deductions at the end of the tenancy.
Tenancy deposit schemes were first introduced by the UK Government in 2007, offering much needed security and protection to landlords, tenants and agents, as part of the drive to professionalise the rental sector. If you rent out a property on an assured shorthold tenancy (AST) (or an occupation contract in Wales), and decide to take a ‘cash’ deposit from your tenant, then legally you must place it in a tenancy deposit scheme within 30 days of receiving it and provide your tenant with detail of the protection that includes how the deposit is protected, which is called the ‘prescribed information’ within the same timeframe.
Most tenancies are automatically ASTs. You’ll know that they are an AST if all of the following conditions apply:
Tenancy deposit schemes offer the landlord (or agent acting on their behalf) two options. One is for the scheme to hold the deposit, which is free (custodial scheme), and the other allows the landlord or agent to hold the deposit but they must pay the scheme to insure it (insured scheme).
Across the UK there are three government-backed schemes a landlord can choose from, mydeposits is the only provider that covers all UK regions, and Jersey.
If the landlord or agent decides there are no deductions to be made, then the deposit can be returned in full to the tenant. In the event of settlements or issues being proposed that require resolution at the end of the tenancy, the process is different depending on which type of scheme has been used:
Custodial:
If there is a case for proposing settlements, then both parties (landlord and tenant) need to confirm to the scheme how much should be returned to the tenant. If the landlord wishes to make a claim and the tenant disagrees, then the scheme’s adjudicators need to be provided with evidence to make an impartial decision. Their decision will be final.
Insured:
If the landlord wishes to propose a settlement and the tenant disagrees, then the unresolved amount that the landlord is claiming for has to be handed over to the tenancy deposit provider and they will hold it until a resolution has been finalised. Any amount remaining from the deposit is handed over to the tenant immediately.
The most frequent issues which can lead to a formal resolution being needed include damage, redecoration, replacing broken items, cleaning or rent arrears.
If a landlord or agent does not protect their tenant’s deposit and inform the tenant which scheme it is protected with, they have broken the law. This means that the tenant could take them to court and claim compensation of up to three times the deposit, plus costs, plus the original deposit amount for non-protection. It also means that should they wish to evict their tenant; they be unable to as any Section 21 notice will be invalid. For more information on this, read mydeposits guide for the NRLA, ‘The impact of unprotected deposits on evicting your tenant and serving a Section 21 notice’.
The following case study highlights the necessity of checking the deposit is protected and that any agent employed by you to manage your lettings is performing their duties in full.
The landlord said:
What evidence was provided?
What was decided and why?
The decision:
Key takeaway points:
Instead of taking an upfront deposit, a landlord may offer the tenant the choice to pay a monthly ‘subscription’ to help reduce moving-in costs. The landlord still receives the same protection against any damages, or other breaches, as if they’d taken a ‘cash’ deposit. However, there is no potential of deposit related fines as the landlord hasn’t collected money from the tenant. The downside for the tenant is that they do not get any of their money back.
Rent-to-rent, or ‘guaranteed rent schemes’ as they are also known, are increasingly more common in the private rented sector. They are however complex contracts involving multiple parties and responsibilities so can easily go wrong. Two Property Redress Scheme case studies featured in their latest annual report illustrate this:
Rent-to-rent is where a company, a local authority (corporation) or an individual (the ‘rent to renter’) rents a property from a landlord (owner) and the landlord receives a guaranteed rental income for an agreed term, regardless of whether the property is occupied or not. The rent to renter then sublets the property to an ‘occupier tenant’ or tenants, at a higher rent than is paid to the landlord owner, making a profit in return for the risk taken and their efforts. It is ultimately the responsibility of their landlord (the rent to renter) to protect any deposit in one of the government-approved schemes.
As a landlord owner you are vulnerable if your rent to renter does not protect their tenants’ deposits. You could find yourself having to repay deposits in this situation, even if you never received them yourself. It’s therefore a good idea to make it a requirement that your rent to renter supplies you with proof of deposit protections.
For more information on what can go wrong with rent-to-rent, read this NRLA article by PRS Tenancy Mediation, ‘The pitfalls of rent-to-rent: Navigating challenges through mediation’. You can also read this article on LandlordZONE, with advice from Suzy Hershman, Resolution Department Lead at mydeposits, on the need to approach rent-to-rent agreements with caution.
Failure to follow deposit protection regulations can have serious consequences for landlords, particularly those seeking to gain possession of their rental property.
Landlords must recognise that even if they use an agent to manage their tenancies it is the landlord who is ultimately responsible for the deposit protection, so it is vital that you appoint an accredited agent and that you are provided with copies of the relevant documentation.
NRLA members get a 30% discount on the deposit protection fee when they protect a deposit with the mydeposits insurance-based scheme in England and Wales.